$1m does not make you rich, Australians sayBY MARK SMITH | MONDAY, 15 FEB 2016 12:25PMA fifth of those with a household income of $200,000 are living pay-cheque to pay-cheque and having $1 million does not make you rich. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Insignia research, retirement income head to depart
Insignia Financial has confirmed its head of research and retirement income is set to leave the business as part of an ongoing wider change.
Geopolitical risks push APAC family office allocations locally
Geopolitical risks are dictating how family offices in the Asia Pacific invest as more intend to shift asset allocations to their home regions, according to UBS.
New platform launches for high-net-worth families
The new wealthtech platform aims to assist in intergenerational wealth transfers.
SEC approves eight Ethereum ETFs
The SEC has given it's stamp of approval for Ethereum ETFs, including for BlackRock, Fidelity and VanEck among others.
Products
Featured Profile
Matt Gaden
HEAD OF AUSTRALIA
JANUS HENDERSON INVESTORS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
JANUS HENDERSON INVESTORS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
Helping investors traverse financial markets and build their wealth during the peaks and troughs is Janus Henderson Investors head of Australia Matt Gaden's game plan. He tells Karren Vergara why in this long game of investing, active management wins.
Unfortunately what having $1m in super now does is that it disqualifies you from the Seniors Health Care card, therefore giving you the dubious pleasure of paying much more for your health costs and missing out on discounts offered to other seniors.
Also self-funded retirees miss out on "compensation" offered to others, including on the now hopefully dead and buried proposal to raise the GST, which would have been a 5% impost on our cost of living.
The constant threats of more changes are also worrying, including the proposal to tax earnings on super backing income-streams, whereas if we withdraw the money and invest elsewhere and earn less than the threshold we will pay zero tax.